> Sunni Response An Expose on Anwar al-Awlaki Fiqh of Jihaad

[al-boriqee]

I was asked every now and then by members to clarify some aspects of speech geared towards Anwar al-Awlaki most likely due to many of the lectures he has given along with the style and depth of articulation he utilizes in them.
This thread is not geared towards the general aspects of his lectures but most notably with his fiqh and articulation of jihaad and how he views and forms his ideology along those lines.

Source 1:
http://salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_Awlaki.pdf

Source 2:
http://salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_Awlaki3

Source 3:
http://salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_Awlaki2

inshallah these should be sufficient to clarify this matter

[Sensationnz]

Did u give these lectures.

Wsallam

[al-boriqee]

what lectures

If your talking about these ebooks, then no

[salman]

no offense to anyone, even though I don't agree with everything Imam Anwar says, but I don't trust salafimanhaj brothers. They are too busy with refuting the individuals and then their problem with issue of imaan and kufr and holding onto "salafism". I am glad I read the book of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraheem (rahimahullah) on ruling by other than Allah and fatawa of Lajjanah against Shakyh Ali al-Halabi before it was too late.

[abdulrahman al muhajir]

Originally Posted by salman

no offense to anyone, even though I don't agree with everything Imam Anwar says, but I don't trust salafimanhaj brothers. They are too busy with refuting the individuals and then their problem with issue of imaan and kufr and holding onto "salafism". I am glad I read the book of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraheem (rahimahullah) on ruling by other than Allah and fatawa of Lajjanah against Shakyh Ali al-Halabi before it was too late.

whats was your out come from shaykh Muhammad ibn ibraheem's book?

[salman]

^akhee please refer to #17; you can read my conclusion at end of the post. and Allah knows best

[al-boriqee]

Originally Posted by salman

no offense to anyone, even though I don't agree with everything Imam Anwar says, but I don't trust salafimanhaj brothers. They are too busy with refuting the individuals and then their problem with issue of imaan and kufr and holding onto "salafism". I am glad I read the book of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraheem (rahimahullah) on ruling by other than Allah and fatawa of Lajjanah against Shakyh Ali al-Halabi before it was too late.

i checked out the list of people they attacked. I found 4 groups to which each adherent they attacked belonged to

every person they attacked was either a
1. sufi
or
2. an ash'ari (we can include the mutazilah here)
or
3. a repugnant modernist
or
4. a bonifide khariji.

every name listed on that site is a follower of one of these four millahs of Iblees.
So when it is stated how these dudes (who actually opposed spubs on pretty much most of their wackness) are too busy refuting individuals, in the view of quite a number of people, this is exactly the same argument that each of the members of these heresies posit against us, even here at islam-life.

As for eman and kufr, I need this information. Im not aware of an alim saying they have a problem with eman and kufr. And after reading them and what their detractors say, their detractors could not even understand irjaa or emaan in the first place. But of course, what expertise can one expect from people who went against the entirety of the ulema and claimed that al-Albanee was a murji in light of Ibn Uthaymeen telling people like them that they either don't know irj'aa, or they don't know al-Albanee.

as for salafism. ajeeb. we find criticism for them for a salafism that we ourselves are the propagators of.

I think there may be an issue in how some people view them. I think that some people view them synonymously as spubs. Far be it to say the least.

however, i really need the info on their issues of eman because i need to know if i am going to trade the likes of Ibn Ibraheem, Ibn Jibreen, Ibn Katheer, IQ, and IT and opt for people like Alamaah Abu Zubair, Alaamah al-Awlaki, and the ulema of IA.

As for the erroneous fatwa that the lajna passed which not to many cosigned, al-Hamdulillah, their refusal to agree with it was good enough. It is also understandable that according to what we know of Bin Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen, they would have never allowed for such a blunder of a fatwa to be passed while their names are attached to the lajnah.

I don't care about Halabi now nor do I really take from him to begin with and he has other problems, however he blasted that fatwa from every pitfall it had in several angles. The only one to reply to him was the partisan Muhammad ibn Salim ad-Dawsari may Allah guide them both.

however, despite all of this, al-hamdulillah, the links above are actually either the direct statements of the rabbani ulema or they are contrast efforts between his beliefs and the beliefs of ahlu-sunnah, with marginal notes of their own on their footnotes.

his case was clear to me and many people of the sunnah way before that site was even formed. So none of this is actually news to me.

anyway
al-hamdulillah may Allah guide us to His straight way and to increase us in knowledge that benefits, ameen

[Haqekka']

Originally Posted by salman

I am glad I read the book of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraheem (rahimahullah) on ruling by other than Allah

As Salamu Alaykum!
Can you tell me the name,pls!

[salman]

^wa'alaykum as-salam

The name of Shaykh's risla (treaty) is Tahkeem al-Qawaneen and you can dowloand the English version from Ruling by the Law

[Haqekka']

Jazzak Allahu khayran Salman!
short and complete :)