> Proposed Refutation !

[Abd al-Muhsin al Hindy]

AsSalaamu alaykum,

Well I was thinking that would'nt it be good that we write a refutation to Ali Sina 's Unscholarly book "Understanding Muhammad" Something like that!

I think insted of refuting his articles we should first refute his kiddish book. This is my proposed Dawah Project as so far I haven't seen any refutation to his book. So why don't we TEAM IDAWAH try and refute it !!!!

I hope we will start soon!

AsSalaamu alaykum.

[Qatada]

asalaam alaikum


I think it would be wasting our time on him and giving him unneeded attention, doesn't he just repeat past accusations?

[Al Habeshi]

Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem,

as-Salaamu 'Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah,

What are the main points brought up and what would you want to refute?

br.al-Habeshi

[Abd al-Muhsin al Hindy]

AsSalaamu alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barkatuhu,

Well , Sina's Sheer lack of Islamic Knowledge;his false claim that he is a Ex-Muslim (He was a kaafir (Sheeah) and is one);All of his absurd claim's like prophets hate for his mom! Hence in his life time he never visited his grave!(Visiting Graves was Forbidden at first and allowed later)!!!!....etc I Believe once his will be refuted his popularity will decrease!!!!!
Well I think its good time ,good place to start the good work!!!!!!!


AsSalaamu alaykum.

[Assad]

What I know is that when layman people search internet and come across all these lies by islamophobes, they start on looking for refutation for them as they themselves have not much knowledge to distinguish the truth and lie. So I dont think that writing a rebuttal is giving unnecessary time or attention but we can simply make one rebuttal and leave it there rather than answering counter rebbutals too, that is to make our self clear by spreading the truth.

If we were to progress with this rebuttal, than I would provide any support necessary inshallah.

[Aayah]

Sorry, I am slightly off topic here... but who is this man?

I did a google and youtube search and got confused results!!

Is he a Shi'i man or someone that left Islam? because these results are what I found

any links will be appreciated...... jazakum Allah khair in advance

[Al Habeshi]

Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem,

as-Salaamu 'Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah.

Ok, it seems like some people are up for it. I think though the brother brought up some points which may be good to speak about. I think they can easily be worked around;

1. Giving him unnecesary attention - well I think we would not need to say REFUATION OF ALI SINA or even UNDERSTANDING ...REFUTED. We could propose a title which seems unrelated if one has not heard of this guy but related if one has. For example, a general title I thought would be good is 'Misunderstanding Muhammad, sallaAllahu alayhi wa salam: The Need to be Ojective in Evaluating the Prophet'

This would also help us tackle the second problem.

2. Its all repeated stuff - well this will make it easier for us since all we have to do is collect the individual refutations from already existing writings. Moreover it would allow us to work on general principles in understanding historical figures. For example, that one should look at all the evidence before making his mind up. I think that should be the main part of the book - the first and then we could have a second part dealing with the specific incidents.


Br.al-Habeshi

[Qatada]

asalaam alaikum


he's an anti islamic guy.



i'm in insha Allah

[Aayah]

Originally Posted by Qatada

asalaam alaikum

he's an anti islamic guy.

Can you post any related link, please?

[salman]

^akhee, come on, don't do that

sister, don't worry about him...he is not important and neither you need to know about him or visit his website - all you need to know is that he is an ex-Muslim and Islamic hater. you can check out my two rebuttals to his articles in Faithfreedom and Wikiislam to find out his batil aqeedah.

@Qatada

akhee, I don't think by posting rebuttals to his arguments we'll be giving him unwanted attention. I think it is important to refute him, given that he has something new. If it is same old stuff then it has been addressed by Muslims so many times before, and we don't really need to do much except compile them.

@Habeshi

akhee, I like your idea, but I think it would be better for masses if we mention within article, who for example propagates these batil attacks. But definitely, we can title it as general.

khayr, if you guys would want to start, then just form/organize a mini team, assign duties and then go ahead with it in this thread. if you need any help from me (i.e., technical), then let me know, insha'Allah.