> REFERENCE: An Index of Commonly used Christian Words, & Links to Responses

[Aayah]

Originally Posted by Al Habeshi

Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem,

as-Salaamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah,

I would personally advise against giving articles from the answering-christianity site unless they are verified or at least sound right.

The worst thing to have in an article is unsupported sidenotes which are used by opponents to take focus away from the point. For example,

The Jews also reject the trinity, in addition to the very first groups of Christianity such as the Ebonites, the Corinthians, the Basilidians, the Capocratians, and the Hypisistarians never know about trinity doctrine at all. The Arians, Paulicians and Goths also accepted Jesus (peace be upon him) as a prophet of God and against the trinity.

This from the article on Trinity needs evidence and sounds misleading, because, for example, we don't know what some of them believed about Jesus, so we cannot claimed they did not believe trinity.

Wa Alykom Asalam Wa Rahmatullah Wa Barakatuh...

SubhanAllah!! I was just thinking of asking about getting anything from answering-christianity before I posted my last post!

So, do you mean that its not enough to be as a typical refutation because of lack of comprehensive explanation?

[salman]

Although brother Usamah has publiclay declared changes in his views (adopting the correct way of da'wah) and repenting from his old mistakes, it is still not advised to take articles from his website. We don't know if he has updated them yet or maybe he will be taking them down in future. We can use other better websites. On topic of Christianity, we can also trust akh Sami Zatari's website (muslim-responses); however, when it comes to defending Islam, I am not too sure about correctness and valid approach of his responses.

and Allah knows best

[Aayah]

JazakumAllah khair for informing me that.....I will edit the links soon inshaAllah, but can't someone contact him by any mean to make sure that the articles were updated? because the site in general contains many good articles.

I have been in bro Sami site before, I guess I have to pay it another visit inshaAllah.

[Qatada]

asalaam alaikum


to anyone who quotes from that site (or any other controversial site), why not make a thread or copy and paste of the specific refutation? that way its not controversial, and you get to keep the good refutation too! :D

[Aayah]

Originally Posted by Qatada

asalaam alaikum


to anyone who quotes from that site (or any other controversial site), why not make a thread or copy and paste of the specific refutation? that way its not controversial, and you get to keep the good refutation too! :D

SubhanAllah I thought about that too! Because half of the page for a certain refutaion is only for promoting links for other related topics in the same site and then have the refutation itself in the end of the page which might be confusing because of so many other topiscs links in he top.

Khair inshaAllah, but will the refutation' threads be checked carefully before using them in the index?

[Al Habeshi]

Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem,

as-Salaamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah,

I was not actually warning against any ideas on the site, I was actually just saying that when refuting Christianity or anything it is essential that the refutation is solid and truthful, many people make claims without being able to objectivly/logically back them up.

And if an article is refuting something then the author should not leave room for it to be attacked or place weak points which the opponent will use to move the focus from the main points made.

So I ask, what is the evidence that the Corinthians rejected the trinity, or did not believe in it?!

One needs evidence for this and this is what Christians will focus on to divert the readers from the main points of the articles.

So let it be clear that I'm not warning from the Brother for I don't know him, I'm merely stating that things need to be verified.

Br.al-Habeshi

[Aayah]

Originally Posted by Qatada

asalaam alaikum


to anyone who quotes from that site (or any other controversial site), why not make a thread or copy and paste of the specific refutation? that way its not controversial, and you get to keep the good refutation too! :D

Wa Alykom Asalam

I wanted to post the previous refutations I posted here in new threads, but in some refutations there are links for some other concepts and articles that direct to the same site....so, what should I do?

Remove the links?
Or posted the whole thing in the new thread?
Or leave the whole site and use another one?
Or?

[Qatada]

asalaam alaikum


if u can remove the links, that's good. if you can't, just copy only what's relevant.

if you think that's gona take too long, just find a new site insha Allah.

[Aayah]

Asalam Alykom

I wonder if this project is still going on...or its stopped as the rest of the projects here!!!

Here are some interesting articles I just came across:

P:
-Punishment in the Bible



H:
-Honor killing in the Bible


S:
-Slavery in Bible