> THE ORIGINS OF SUPERSTITIOUS RELIGION OF DARWINISM - Harun Yahya (new)

[Assad]

:

There is a new and informative article about atheism on the Harun Yahya's website. This explain in detail that atheism and the scientific theories supposedly proving atheism/evolution whatever, stem from ancient pagan religion and are only transformed in our world with a scientific wallpaper.

Check it out:
Harun Yahya - THE ORIGINS OF SUPERSTITIOUS RELIGION OF DARWINISM - Download Page

[Abdul-Fattah]

Originally Posted by Acid

:

There is a new and informative article about atheism on the Harun Yahya's website. This explain in detail that atheism and the scientific theories supposedly proving atheism/evolution whatever, stem from ancient pagan religion and are only transformed in our world with a scientific wallpaper.

Check it out:
Harun Yahya - THE ORIGINS OF SUPERSTITIOUS RELIGION OF DARWINISM - Download Page

Evolution/Darwinism is not a belief,religion. People might debate on which parts are theory, and which parts are hypothesis, but calling it belief or religion makes Islam/Muslims look stupid by association. As for the actual content, those arguments are all far-fetched and speculative. Just because some ancient belief systems had parts which are a bit similar to evolution, doesn't mean that both are pagan-beliefs. That's like saying a house and a bridge that have similar bricks, are both the same construct.

[salman]

As-Salamu 'Alaykum

bro, please try not to post Harun Yahya's stuff. Many times he tries to stretch things out. Let's not even talk about his aqeedah; he believes in wahdatul wajoud.

[Qatada]

asalaam alaikum


Alhamdulillah he has alot of informative work, but if u want to debate with someone - try not to mention his name - as your source of debate - since it gives u a bad record. But his work refuting atheism can be helpful alot though alhamdulillah.

[Assad]

I dont understand how Harun Yahya believes in wahdatul wajoud. I saw one video by Billal Phillips in which he accuse H.Yahya for this but when I chekced the refered book, ont the same page number, I did not find anything to that effect.

Do we have any solid prove against him?

[Qatada]

asalam alykum

Acid, he does. He then uses science to justify it(ie saying that the mind is the only thing which percieves everything but since its only meat, there has to be something else ie everything in life is just an illusion.)

Theres one of his books in our college (called For Men of Understanding) and its reaaally good, but the last chapter discusses that topic so i try to avoid showing it people. A big let down.